Not Invented Here - The Real Reason Non-Western Cultures Resent The Values Of The European Enlightenment

One of my friends sent me a link to a Twitter thread.

Journalist Sadanand Dhume (handle @dhume) had earlier tweeted:

Calm, dignified and hopeful address by Queen Elizabeth II. Commonwealth countries that have her as head of state are fortunate.

The response from Twitter handle @shrikanth_krish - one Śrīkānta Kṛṣṇamācārya (who seems to have given his name a deliberately hard-to-parse (although phonologically correct!) spelling as a personal symbol of cultural assertion) followed from there.

In case the link disappears, let me re-post the entire text below.

What @dhume is hinting at here is -

India should've opted for the British monarch as our ceremonial head of state in 1947

Instead of an indirectly elected Presidency we have today

Clearly that view stems from the massive chasm that exists between the Indian elites and the Indian masses

The old Anglophone elite has always retained an affinity towards Britain and the English speaking world

While the masses nurse deep ill-will towards Britain

India is not quite Australia.

Race matters.

In countries like Aus, NZ, the population was predominantly Anglo-Saxon. Their struggle was one for self-governance.

Not cultural liberation

In India, the revolt against Britain was not merely one for political independence or representation

That angle was predominant among the Anglophone moderates. The Dadabhai Naorojis and Srinivasa Sastris of the world.

But once the movement involved the masses (starting with Tilak and Gandhi), the revolt was in large measure a cultural one.

A movement to rid India of the foreign yoke.

To this day, I think the "elites" haven't quite understood this aspect of the "freedom struggle"

There is a tendency to regard the independence movement in purely political terms

Ignoring the racial, cultural element

In my view, Gandhian struggle was as much about "cultural liberation" as it was about "political independence / representation"

But once Gandhi passed on, and the narrative moved to the Nehru-led Congress post independence, the emphasis changed

Post independence, there was an attempt to underplay the "cultural independence" part - v much a part of Gandhi's movement.

Instead the "political freedom" angle was overplayed

The "cultural" conflict with British Raj became something that only the Jana Sangh/RSS picked on

So what was "mainstream" before 1947, became a right wing talking point post 1947

I think this hurt Indian politics

Instead of having a bi-partisan cultural consensus, and having the Right-Left division on policy issues, "Culture" became the bone of contention b/w Rght and Left

Now the retort to this would be -

Hey ...

Countries like Jamaica and Antigua have Queen Elizabeth as head of state

Why not India?

The answer is politically incorrect

The fact is -

India is not just a proud, and ancient civilization. But a world unto itself

Jamaica is not, with all due respect.

Deep down Indians do not believe the "Enlightenment" has all the answers to humanity's problems

They have a distinct religious and moral world view that is antagonistic to that of the West

The Caribbean nations lack such an intellectual counter-view. They're part of the West

I found the thread very enlightening, especially this one sentence:

Deep down, Indians do not believe the "Enlightenment" has all the answers to humanity's problems.

I believe the thread author has hit the nail on the head. This indeed is the core issue.

The European Enlightenment - a pivotal point in human history

As philosopher AC Grayling said, the 17th century was "the epoch in the story of the human mind". At the start of the century, the European worldview resembled its predecessors [I would add here that it also resembled its contemporaries in every other culture], but by the end of the century, it had become modern. "The Earth was no longer the centre of the universe; monarchy, disrobed and beheaded, was no longer sacred; and science – methodical, empirical science – was no longer in thrall to magic and superstition."

I can't find a source for this, but it's a pretty fair picture of the core components of the Enlightenment

All cultures and civilisations around the world started off being superstitious and feudal, and most were also extremely sexist. No ancient civilisation was free of gods, and even "democratic" Greece had slaves. I believe every civilisation needs to have an Enlightenment in order to cross the chasm from superstition, feudalism and sexism to a more progressive society.

Unfortunately, only Western civilisation has had an Enlightenment that is home-grown.

What we have seen in the history of the modern world is the Western-owned model of a progressive society being thrust upon other civilisations in the form of post-colonial constitutions, which don't resonate with the cultural soil of former colonies. This therefore leads to resentment against the basic values themselves, which is a pity.

I don't believe there is a real alternative to the values of the Enlightenment, because every "solution" offered by nationalist advocates is either a defiant return to regressive traditions or simply old Western wine in a new culturally-resonant bottle. Much as nativists may protest, I have simply not seen a real challenge to the values of the European Enlightenment.

For example, I've often heard the phrase "decolonise your mind" used in this context, but what does it really mean?

The following clip is a rather dystopian one - from South Africa, I believe. The objective of the meeting is laudable - to spark a genuinely native approach to knowledge that is not shackled by colonial modes of thinking. Then one of the speakers goes on to talk about witchcraft as an example of what science cannot explain. When a member of the audience protests that witchcraft isn't true, the panel triumphantly seizes on that objection both as a sign of a colonised mind and as a sign of disrespect for the native culture and the gathering. The person is forced to apologise.

If these are examples of "decolonised" minds, give me colonialism any day!

I believe there is no alternative to the values that the European Enlightenment was the first to discover. I've seen many of the putative alternatives, and they range from insufficient to unacceptable. I think non-Western civilisations are rejecting progressive values only because of their source, i.e., because those ideas were "not invented here".

And so, I'm forced to the conclusion that the only viable solutions are either to let non-Western civilisations meander through a few more centuries of ignorance and injustice until they arrive at these values through their own painful experience, or to somehow enable them to develop feelings of ownership over the values of the Enlightenment.

Because it's really all about a sense of ownership. The Enlightenment itself is just fine.

India In Danger Of Repeating Sri Lanka's Deadly Error

Pluralistic societies must beware of elevating one group above all others. The day Sri Lanka made Sinhala its state language and Buddhism its state religion was the day it sowed the seeds of its longstanding ethnic strife. The revolt of the Tamil linguistic minority has been put down at great cost. But the Sri Lankan government does not seem at all serious about pursuing genuine rapprochement or providing autonomy to the Tamils within a looser federation. Far from learning a lesson from those lost decades, elements of the country's political class and clergy now seem to have turned towards baiting the Muslim religious minority, and another round of bloodletting appears to be on the cards. As one who has visited that beautiful country and interacted with many of its smart and gentle people, I can only shake my head in sorrow. Sri Lanka's problems are needless ones of its own creation, all because of a fundamental lack of governing wisdom.

India has long escaped such a fate, thanks to the abundance of wisdom on the part of its founding fathers. The early tussle with the Muslim League on the one hand and the Hindu Mahasabha on the other must have convinced the leaders of the Congress of the desirability of establishing a secular state that treated all its religions equally. And while Nehru came perilously close to imposing a single language (Hindi) on a country where over 60% spoke another language, he wisely stepped back from the brink in the face of protests. India has enjoyed rare harmony in its public life because religion has largely remained a private matter, and its unique "three language formula" has given individuals, governments and private organisations pragmatic ways to communicate.

Over time, a remarkable sense of Indian nationhood has begun to develop (even if it has frayed slightly around the edges thanks to vote-bank politics). Free of heavy-handed imposition, Hindi has spread even to traditionally non-Hindi regions, often thanks to the subtle charms of Bollywood. At the same time, English has spread among the relative elite, forming a link language for the educated class. All wholesome developments, one would think.

The party, however, seems to have come to a rude and abrupt end with the election of Narendra Modi's BJP in May 2014. At first, the focus of the government seemed to be on economic development, and in that endeavour, the prime minister won quick support, including from many erstwhile critics. A potential sour note was religion. The BJP has always been known as a Hindu party, and most public attention has been on the likely relationship between a BJP government and its non-Hindu citizens. While Modi has been careful to project an inclusive image, there have been some disturbing incidents of violence carried out by radical fringe groups with a more hard-line Hindu agenda. The old fault-line of religion has therefore come under renewed strain.

Disturbingly, another old fault-line has been needlessly opened up.  Initially, Modi's preference for Hindi over English in his official communications was ascribed to his relative lack of fluency in English and his understandable preference for a language in which he was more at home. But continuing reports of the government's edicts in favour of Hindi over English have begun to raise eyebrows. The home minister, Rajnath Singh, who was noted for his past statements that the English language has destroyed India's culture, has begun to crack the whip to ensure that the sole language in which his ministry does business is Hindi.

It's clear where the Hindu right is coming from. They are aware that opposition to their Hindutva ideology comes primarily from two broad groups of people - religious minorities and the English-speaking urban middle class. Nothing less than a culture war is now on to undercut the power of these groups. In terms of religion, language and class, the Hindu right wing has identified its foes and begun its offensive.

The world has its eyes on India's old religious schisms, so the government will probably tread carefully there. But the other war (the linguistic/class war) is equally dangerous, and here the government has fewer checks on its actions. 

There are at least four problems with the Modi government's lurch to a majoritarian agenda:

1. The mandate that the BJP received in the recent election was for its plank of economic development. Starting a culture war when there are pressing economic problems to be solved is not just a betrayal of that mandate but a luxury the country cannot afford.

2. The purpose of language is communication. The existing three language formula has served India well, allowing people and organisations to negotiate a suitable common language to communicate in without coercion. There is no reason to ram a language down people's throats unless the motive is to disenfranchise a group of cultural enemies. In addition, insistence on an "official" Hindi, quite different in flavour from the everyday Hindi favoured by most speakers, is counter-productive. Official Hindi is often unintelligible even to Hindi speakers, and is an impediment rather than an aid to communication.

3. Then there is the whole hypocrisy angle. Politicians who rail against the English language, such as Rajnath Singh and Mulayam Yadav, see no contradiction between their public stand and giving their own offspring an English language education and sending them abroad to study. They obviously know which side of their bread is buttered (or if they so prefer, which side of their roti is makkhandaar), but will not acknowledge that English is an aspirational language for millions of their countrymen and could help to improve the career prospects and living standards of the next generation. It's one rule for them and another rule for the masses.

4. Finally, although English is in many ways a "foreign" language to India, its very foreignness makes it neutral. It does not belong more naturally to one group of Indians than to another. If English is to be replaced by Hindi, all Indians who speak a different Indian language automatically become second class citizens, because their own languages are relegated to secondary status behind Hindi. When one Indian is forced to speak to another in a language that is not their own but is native to the other, it creates a power asymmetry that will be deeply resented. It is no way to build a nation.

Those who point to countries like Japan, Korea and Germany to argue that India should have its own national language are missing an important distinction. All of these countries have a single language of their own, so it is natural for that language to be the national language. India has 22 official languages, all of them equally Indian. How can any one of them be termed the "national" language without making the others seem less national? In the same vein, wouldn't anointing India a "Hindu" country alienate citizens of other religions who are every bit as patriotic? It is for this reason that majoritarian politics is dangerous in pluralistic societies, and it is highly inadvisable for a country to create second-class citizens out of its religious and linguistic minorities. Sri Lanka is a warning to the world, but it appears that India cannot see what is, in a geographically literal sense, right beneath its nose.

The Modi government and its ideological fountainhead (the RSS) appear to have overreached themselves. They have turned the country's colourful diversity into ugly difference. And with their roughshod tactics, they have brought their government's honeymoon to an abrupt end.

Liberal India Plays Whack-A-Clown With Joker Politicians

[This is an ever-lengthening blog post because of the never-ending parade of clowns that is emerging from the woodwork.]

Reading the daily news coming out of India these days, I'm reminded of the arcade game Whack-a-Clown. Whenever a clown pops his head out of one of several holes in a board, you have to be fast and whack him before he pops back in. The more clowns you manage to whack, the higher your score.

If only they could talk and say outrageous things, whacking them would be so much more fun!

The Indian version is played with live politicians and is vastly more entertaining.

However, this game had a very sombre beginning. A girl was brutally raped and assaulted by a gang of men in Delhi, and she later died in hospital. The incident shone a spotlight on the appalling lack of safety for women in India, and this is when the clowns started to appear, each with his assessment of the situation and a prescription straight from the middle ages.

Each time a clown popped his head out of a hole and made a statement, the liberal media and Twitter were all over him. Whack! Dazed and confused, the clown would mumble an apology and duck back into his hole, only to be followed very shortly after by another clown from another hole. Whack! And so the game continues.

1. Abhijit Mukherjee, MP and son of the President:

Women who are participating in candlelight vigils and those who are protesting have no connection with ground reality. These pretty ladies coming out to protest are highly dented and painted, they're giving interviews on TV, they've brought their children to show them the scenes. I have grave doubts whether they're students, because women of that age are generally not students.

After a public dressing-down from his own sister, Mukherjee apologised for hurting sentiments, but pointedly did not disavow his remark.

Abhijit Mukherjee - dented, yes; repented, no.

2. Botsa Satyanarayana, Andhra Pradesh Congress Committee President:

Just because India got freedom at midnight, is it necessary for women to move on the streets at midnight? [...] The woman should not have boarded a private bus at such an odd hour. She should have assessed the situation before getting into the bus [...] Though it was a minor incident, UPA chairperson Sonia Gandhi was gracious enough to intervene and hold negotiations with the protestors to bring the situation under control.

When his remarks drew strong criticism even from his own party, Satyanarayana called a press conference to apologise and offer a breathtaking spin on what he had meant, "What I meant was that the government should create an atmosphere where women can move around even at midnight."

Whack! This was a satisfying one.

Botsa Satyanarayana - At the stroke of the midnight hour, when the world sleeps, India produces clowns like this

3. Shafiqur Rahman Barq, BSP MP:

Young men are provoked to commit rape because of the way women dress. Since they dress like Europeans, incidents of rape are taking place in the country. Such mishaps happen because of women's provocative clothing. Earlier there was a decency in the way women dressed, but that is missing now.

No word on whether Barq has apologised for his remarks. This clown seems to have managed to duck back into his hole before he could be whacked on the head.

Shafiqur Rahman Barq - We already have a saffron Taliban, but I suppose we can make room for the real one

4. Kailash Vijayvargiya, Madhya Pradesh BJP Industries Minister:

Women must keep themselves within the limits of 'maryada' (morality/dignity) or face the music. [...] Everyone must stay within Lakshman Rekha (line in the sand). Ravan grabs and takes away those who cross the line just as he kidnapped Sita.

I guess his tortured misquoting from the Ramayana annoyed even his saffron groupies, and after some criticism from all quarters, he finally apologised. Whack, whack!

Kailash Vijayvargiya - realised too late the perils of crossing the Lakshman Rekha

5. Mohan Bhagwat, RSS Chief:

Such crimes hardly take place in 'Bharat', but they occur frequently in 'India'[...] You go to villages and forests of the country and there will be no such incidents of gang-rape or sex crimes. They are prevalent in some urban belts. Besides new legislation, Indian ethos and attitude towards women should be revisited in the context of ancient Indian values.

The BJP did not turn on Bhagwat the way it did on Vijayvargiya, and defended him. The clown ducked, only to pop up again very soon.

A husband and wife are involved in a contract under which the husband has said that you should take care of my house and I will take care of all your needs. I will keep you safe. So, the husband follows the contract terms. Till the time [sic] the wife follows the contract, the husband stays with her, if the wife violates the contract, he can disown her.

To be fair, there is some controversy over whether he said this as a statement of his belief, or whether he was quoted out of context and was actually referring to Western marriages as contracts with these terms. I'll give him the benefit of the doubt. However, even in the clarification by the RSS, what emerges is this:

He (Bhagwat) said that western marriage system is contractual [...] Whereas the Indian marriage system is a sacred concept where women have a lot of respect and men have certain obligations.

Even in the sanitised version, what emerges is Mohan Bhagwat's and the RSS's contempt for Western marriages, where (just as a simple example of practical respect) men happen to do much more of the housework than Indian men are wont to do. The cultural jingoism of the RSS is beyond belief.

Mohan Bhagwat - the official RSS clown outfit and idiotic faux Nazi salute make the red nose superfluous

6. Ashok Singhal, VHP International Advisor:

This western model is alarming. What is happening is we have imbibed the US. We have lost all the values we had, in the cities. [The live-in relationship style] is not only foreign to our culture, but also hostile. [...] Indians lived a life of 'purity' prior to the arrival of British rulers [...] 'purity' of virginity ('brahmacharyam'), is being disturbed. Virginity was preserved. But the purity has been totally disturbed. Now we are losing it.

No criticism was fast enough for this clown, who managed to duck back into his hole.

Ashok Singhal - The western model of overseas Hindus filling VHP coffers with dollars is even more alarming

It isn't just political leaders. Babas and godmen are not to be outdone.

7. Asaram Bapu, "spiritual" leader:

It's not just 5-6 people who are the culprits. The victim daughter is as guilty as her rapists. She should have called the culprits brothers and begged before them to stop. This could have saved her dignity and life. [...] Can one hand clap? I don't think so. [When the girl encountered six drunk men] she should have taken God's name and could have held the hand of one of the men and said I consider you as my brother and should have said to the other two 'Brother I am helpless, you are my brother, my religious brother.' She should have taken God's name and held their hands and feet...then the misconduct wouldn't have happened.

Protests have been organised against him and even the BJP has condemned his statements. Other godmen have also condemned his statements. But so far, no apology. This clown refuses to bow even after being whacked.

Asaram Bapu - Can one hand clap? No, but it can slap. Too bad no one did.

Cartoon in The Hindu

8. T Thiagarajan, Education minister, Union Territory of Puducherry:

The meeting resolved to introduce overcoats for girl students, operate special buses for them and ban mobile phones in schools. Our government is committed to ensuring safety of women, particularly girl students.

Puducherry is not exactly known for a cool climate, so clearly the government considers heat strokes from the use of overcoats to be the lesser evil.

And I don't know about you, but if I was concerned about the safety of my school-going daughter, I would sure as hell ensure she had her mobile phone with her at all times! How will taking away a girl's means of communication keep her safer?

It was a cowardly response that was just meant to show that the government was doing something, with no regard to whether the solution was appropriate or even workable.

There was thankfully no shortage of willing hands that emerged with alacrity to whack this set of clowns down.

All India Democratic Women's Association general secretary Sudha Sundararaman, who strongly criticised the government's decision to make overcoats compulsory, charged that the government had trivialized the issue without addressing the root of the problem. "By evolving a dress code, the government has made women answerable and accountable for the crime instead of perpetrators of the crime, which is totally unacceptable," she said.

That's telling them.

The Puducherry government hastily backtracked, as all cowards are known to do.

T Thiagarajan, sans overcoat, put his own spin on the government's original decision as well as its U-turn, which fooled nobody and simply offered more entertainment.

The idea to switch from dupattas to overcoats for women students was only for the sake of convenience, as dupattas often tend to get caught in cycle chains [...] the term “overcoat” itself is a misnomer [...] The government was considering changing the uniforms anyway and instead of the earlier dupatta, many principals thought that a waistcoat over the student’s uniform would be more comfortable for them to wear.

Nice try!

T Thiagarajan - Southern stupidity

With apologies to the old patriotic slogan, "Kashmir to Kanyakumari, India is one...big bunch of jokers"

9. Abu Azmi, Samajwadi Party MLA, Maharashtra State assembly:

Women should not venture out with men who are not relatives [...] What is the need for roaming at night with men who are not relatives? This should be stopped [...] Such incidents (like the Delhi gang rape) happen due to influence of western culture [...] Scantily-clad women attract male attention [...] rape cases are on the rise due to women wearing less clothes [...] rape is a phenomenon that happens in cities and not in villages

Wow! This guy pretty much covered it all. He trumped all the rest by casting the widest possible net in search of stupid things to say.

His own family was embarrassed. His son apologised on his behalf, and even his daughter-in-law (a role expected to be docile in Indian families) publicly disagreed with him.

Even after the familial whacking, this clown remained defiant.

The statements made by me were out of concern for women's safety. I stand by them. There is no need to apologize for any of those remarks

His later remarks were telling.

My party may disagree with me, but I find nothing wrong in my statement. I have every right to express my views. I have the freedom to express my views. Similarly, (son) Farhan and (daughter-in-law) Ayesha have the freedom to express their opinion. Differences among family members are because of generation gap

He hit the nail on the head with that last comment. It's the generation gap that is showing in most of these comments (with the curious exception of not-so-old Abhijit Mukherjee).

Abu Azmi - "Do I look like a guy with a plan?...I just say things"

10. Babulal Gaur, Madhya Pradesh BJP Urban Administration & Development minister:

Women in foreign countries wear jeans and T-shirts, dance with other men and even drink liquor, but that is their culture. It's good for them, but not for India, where only our traditions and culture are ok [...] Let women consider what is good and bad for them

Not wishing to go as far as his ministerial colleague Kailash Vijayvargiya, who ominously drew a Lakshman Rekha in the sand that women dare not cross lest the demon Ravan abduct them, Gaur magnanimously left it to women to "consider what is good and bad for them".

Babulal Gaur - He hopes voters don't consider what is good and bad for them

The comments on the news site reporting it were almost unanimously scathing. Here's a sample:

SO WHY U EAT PIZZA & OTHER INTERNATIONAL DISHES

Then what is the difference between Taliban and BJP

Arre Babu lal Guar, which world do you reside in? Have you become senile? wake-up. Our women are no more just those who help milk the cow, clean the floor with cowdung etc. etc. wakie, wakie buddy!

And what about Men.. No sermons for them

If BJP comes to power in India, this will be the fate of Women folk.

chal be anpad aadmi....ja apne gaao me jaakar apni bhainso ka dho.mantri ban ne laayak nai hai tu... (Get lost, you illiterate...go to your village and wash your buffaloes. You aren't fit to be a minister)

Historically in India women and men, especially elders, have been smoking hukkaahs socially and also have been drinking liquor together. This New-Age "Hindu" tradition is actually wrong and made up by mor0ns. It is not against Indian culture for women and men to socially indulge in drinking wine or smoking tobacco.

Ministers!!!! Kindly understand its not WOMAN who are r@ping . So instruct the MEN FOLK how to behave and what to drink or not.

Mr Babulal, would you care to clarify if men aping western culture is Ok with you and if yes then why?

Bjp Leadership Please ask these cartoons to shut their mouth if at all it hopes of coming in to power.....

another politician aping an APE

I am against any restriction on freedom of women.

may be personal views of babulal gaur.looking backward mentality.

A couple of comments like the above may not mean much, but there were so many! This could truly mean India has crossed a civilisational milestone. No politician can turn back the clock. Even better, such obscurantist pontification is no longer even populist.

And now the disease has spread to other officials.

11. Satyapal Singh, Mumbai Police Commissioner:

Sex education needs to be carefully thought out. Look at America. It has sex education as part of its curriculum, but students are simply being taught about how to have intercourse [...] According to a survey, rape is more common than smoking there. Countries with sex education in their curriculum only have an increased number of crimes against women. [...] Television serials openly show pre-marital and extra-marital sex. Nobody condemns it. Plus, the current generation has easy access to pornographic websites. Even cellphones have Internet these days, making it all the more easier

It's shocking to see that a Police Commissioner believes that sex education is about teaching kids to have intercourse. And the traditional morality that inflicts so many has confused his thinking to the extent that he conflates (consensual) pre-marital and extra-marital sex to rape and crimes against women. When will people stop judging consensual sex through the lens of their own morality, and learn to recognise that the evil lies in non-consensual sex?

A commenter named Anushka (Tuesday , 15 Jan '13 21:53:00 PM) posted the most reasoned rebuttal:

One of the first things sex education in the West teaches children is that if someone touches them inappropriately or uncomfortably, they should report this to a responsible adult. If that adult does not report this to the police, he/she becomes complicit and liable in the crime. I can understand why the Police Commissioner is made uncomfortable by the idea of the people, even the youngest members of society, being given the right to protect themselves. At later stages, sex education comprises issues of health, hygiene, love, affection, friendship, acceptance of difference. At all times, respect, for oneself and others, is the keyword. It gives power to the people, which ignorance does not. Police commissioner, please consult expert educators, the UN etc before you make utter such dangerous, ill-informed opinions.

In a previous set of comments, the same Police Commissioner had rambled on about the lack of culture in modern education.

What has happened in Delhi or what happens in Mumbai, it is the consequence of the absence of culture. The education that is imparted in our schools and colleges is devoid of cultural content. Life values are not taught.

Innocuous enough. But he then took his argument a step further, bizarrely claiming that suicides are more common among English-educated people.

Most suicides are committed by those who have studied in the English medium. I have never heard of or seen a Sanskrit-medium educated person committing suicide. And it is a known fact that more and more people are today sending their children to English-medium schools.

I see. So a Sanskrit-medium education can save lives. Better a dead language than dead people, the Commissioner seems to say.

Satyapal Singh - Sex education bad, English education bad. Education is the root of all evil.

While there has been some reaction over the commissioner's remarks, it hasn't attracted the same level of outrage as previous comments from officials. Perhaps, as the doctor-patient cartoon would have it, the liberals aren't suffering from apathy, they're suffering from outrage exhaustion.

The hand that whacks is getting tired. There are simply too many clowns!

First politicians, then Hindu gurus, then non-elected public officials, now the baton passes to non-elected leaders of the Muslim community.

12. Maulana Jalaluddin Umri, head of the Indian Jamaat-e-Islami:

The problem starts with co-education. We are saying educate the girls as much as you want, but give the education separately. [...] Today our society is tolerating and even accepting live-in relationships. This is opening the doors to evil. Why will (such a man) marry? [...] Hindus, Muslims and Christians marry according to their customs. Only such marriages should be legally recognised," he said. Others are living together for years and then going to court to get that registered. Such relations are not good for society.

I guess the silver lining in his speech was that he was willing to recognise marriages performed according to Hindu and Christian customs. That's a great leap forward for a leader of the Muslim community.

And while not an emphatic whack on the head, the Jamaat's Kerala wing was distinctly uncomfortable with the anti-co-education stance of their national leader, and the youth wing of the Jamaat, the JIH-Solidarity, spoke out to say that "the organisation believes in gender equality and gender justice and so there is no need of a separate education system". Wha-aek!

Maulana Jalaluddin Umri - "Educate girls separately"; Just what is it about women's empowerment that scares these old men witless?

13. Mufti Maulana Bashir-ud-din, Kashmir's Grand Mufti:

Girls are responsible for the rape. They should be in their limits. They must wear the veil at all times. They can sing inside their homes. They shouldn't sing in public. They are giving bad signals to men.

He was expressing his disapproval of three Kashmiri high school girls who had formed a rock band and were giving public performances.

Kashmir's young, urbane and Twitter-happy Chief Minister, Omar Abdullah, tweeted in retort:

Given the importance people attach to the fatwas of the Grand Mufti, the less said the better

(He later deleted the tweet, perhaps out of fear for his own skin?!)

The issue has kicked up a storm, and the Mufti is not without his allies who vie with him in issuing similar statements. However, the fatwa has done wonders in stirring up support for the girls across the country, and the Grand Clown is being whacked from all sides.

Mufti Maulana Bashir-ud-din - he and his band are facing the music

Update 14/02/2013: And now that it's Valentine's Day, here's some more.

14. Manoj Solanki, state convener, Hindu Janajagruti Samiti (Society for Awakening the Hindu People):

Since the Bharatiya (Indian) youth is turning towards indulgence by blindly following westerners, it has been noticed that the sale of contraceptives peaks on this day [Valentine's Day].....This leads to a rise in incidents of rapes and other atrocities.

Manoj Solanki - wants Indians to awaken, not sleep (together)

So far, news sites have only reported his statement. There has been no public rebuttal. One can only hope the silence means people are shaking their heads in disbelief.

The disconnect in views shouldn't be too surprising when we remember that the average age of the country is 25, and the average age of its ministers is 65. Only a wholesale purge of the political class will  bring about some semblance of a connected government. And not just the political class but every position of authority held by "old fogies".

It's clear that the culture war is on. The purported saviours of the country, red noses proudly on display, have made their views clear. The cities, the educated, the liberal, the independent women, all of these are the epitome of evil. Only a return to the glories of Indian culture, best preserved in its villages, can save the country.

How many more clowns must we whack before the game is over?

India Learns The Wrong Lessons

The Delhi rape case at first seemed to have a silver lining in that it was forcing India to introspect about the way it treats women.

Alas, the news since then has been bitterly disappointing. It appears that the only lesson learnt has been to blame the victim and "Westernisation".

This news item ends on the following note:

The continuing incidents of rapes have caused such a panic among the local villagers that they have started charting out their own laws putting a blanket ban on use of “sexy” clothes for girls to check rape cases. Since the time Delhi rape victim succumbed to her injuries in a Singapore hospital, as many as six village panchayats and government schools have put a blanket ban on use of jeans pants [sic], skirts and also mobile phones for girls, holding them responsible for such social perversions.

God! What are these earthmen thinking??

Couldn't these people see that in the very cases they were so concerned about, the victims were probably not wearing Western clothes? And doesn't this serve to strengthen the attitude of entitlement among rapists, "But she was wearing Western clothes!" "Ah, that's all right, then. Carry on."

The Hindu right wing had an opportunity to show its colours when a state minister said women would have to pay the price if they crossed a line. His party, the BJP, had to scramble to distance itself from his statement, and forced him to apologise. No prizes for guessing whether he's truly sorry, or whether his party genuinely considers his remarks out of line.

Soon enough though, the BJP was forced to pin its colours to the traditionalist mast when it defended another of its own. The leader of the RSS, the ideological fountainhead of the Hindu right-wing (how is this organisation still allowed to exist after the murder of Gandhi??) said that rape only occurs in "India" and not in "Bhaarat" (the Indian name for India), in effect blaming Westernisation for this evil. Perhaps the best rejoinder would be that rape only occurs in India, since it is balaatkaar (Hindi for rape) that occurs in Bhaarat.

God! What are these humans thinking??

With all this talk of Westernisation and Western clothes being responsible for rape, hasn't it occurred to even one of these geniuses to ask why Indian women living in Western countries, wearing Western clothes and (yes) carrying mobile phones, feel safer travelling and working there than in India? Could it (gasp!) have something to do with the men?

Since then, the RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat has only covered himself in further glory by claiming that women should stay at home and confine themselves to housework, while men go out and earn.

RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat - a ridiculous uniform with schoolboy shorts and a black cap born out of juvenile spite for Gandhi's white one, a silly fascist salute, and hopelessly outdated views. This is another dinosaur who sees the meteor of modernity but has no idea what it means for himself and his ilk.

These events only serve to convince me that there is nothing short of a culture war going on in India, and it is between secular, egalitarian, liberal, urban and educated people and regressive, feudal, patriarchal, orthodox people who are merely literate.

Thanks to globalisation, the Internet, the influential English-language media, the increasing numbers of educated urban youth, and the aspirations of countless others who see such a society not as an evil but as something to aspire to, I have no doubt which way the battle will ultimately go. But it's sad that it has to be a battle in the first place.

God! What are these adults thinking??